A prompt for GPT-4 powered debate teams

Here’s a prompt I made for getting ChatGPT (GPT-4) to run debates (for/against) on different topics on the model of university debate teams. The topic used as an example is “risks and benefits of artificial intelligence” but I have gotten good results with topics such as “gun control” and “drinking alcohol”. You can read the ChatGPT output for the 2 debate teams after the prompts.

Team A (For) Prompt

You are Debate Team A’s leader, and you are participating in the most prestigious debate championship. The motion for this debate is: “This house believes that the widespread development and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) pose more risks than benefits to society.” As the first speaker for the proposition side, you are responsible for presenting the opening arguments in favor of the motion, outlining the main points and justifications for the potential risks posed by artificial intelligence, and refuting the opposition’s arguments. Remember to maintain a formal and persuasive tone throughout your response.

Team B (Against) Prompt

You are Debate Team B’s leader, and you are participating in the most prestigious debate championship. The motion for this debate is: “This house believes that the widespread development and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) pose more risks than benefits to society.” As the second speaker for the opposition side, you are responsible for presenting the arguments against the motion, outlining the main points and justifications for the potential risks posed by artificial intelligence, and refuting the other team’s arguments. Remember to maintain a formal and persuasive tone throughout your response.

Team A (For) Output

Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and distinguished members of the opposition, as the leader of Debate Team A, I stand before you today to argue in favor of the motion: “This house believes that the widespread development and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) pose more risks than benefits to society.”

I will present three main arguments supporting the motion that the risks of AI outweigh its benefits:

  1. AI’s potential impact on employment and income inequality: As AI systems become more advanced, they are likely to displace a significant number of human workers across various industries. This displacement can lead to higher unemployment rates, exacerbate income inequality, and create social unrest as people struggle to adapt to a changing job market.
  2. Ethical concerns and bias in AI decision-making: AI systems are often trained on data that may contain inherent biases, leading to biased outcomes in decision-making processes. This can result in unfair treatment or discrimination against certain groups in areas such as hiring, lending, and law enforcement. Additionally, AI’s increasing role in making decisions raises ethical concerns about the transparency and accountability of these systems.
  3. The potential misuse of AI for harmful purposes: AI technologies can be exploited for malicious purposes, such as creating deepfake videos, autonomous weapons, or cyberattacks. The widespread development and implementation of AI may inadvertently provide bad actors with the tools to cause harm on a large scale, posing significant risks to society.

Now, I will address some potential counterarguments from the opposition:

  • AI’s potential to drive economic growth and innovation: While it is true that AI can contribute to economic growth and innovation, the benefits may not be evenly distributed across society. The potential displacement of human workers and the exacerbation of income inequality could undermine the overall benefits of AI-driven economic growth.
  • AI’s role in solving complex problems and improving efficiency: AI systems can indeed help solve complex problems and improve efficiency in various sectors. However, the potential risks associated with ethical concerns, biased decision-making, and misuse for harmful purposes must be carefully weighed against these benefits.

In conclusion, as the leader of Debate Team A, I maintain that the widespread development and implementation of artificial intelligence pose more risks than benefits to society. It is essential to acknowledge and address these risks as we continue to advance AI technology to ensure the safety, security, and well-being of our society. Thank you.

Team B (Against) Output

Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and distinguished members of the proposition, as the leader of Debate Team B, I stand before you today to argue against the motion: “This house believes that the widespread development and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) pose more risks than benefits to society.”

I will present three main arguments against the motion, highlighting the benefits of AI to society:

  1. AI’s role in driving economic growth and innovation: The development and implementation of AI have the potential to drive significant economic growth by increasing productivity, enabling innovation, and creating new industries. This growth can lead to increased wealth and improved living standards for society as a whole, outweighing the potential risks posed by AI.
  2. AI’s ability to solve complex problems and improve efficiency: AI has demonstrated its ability to solve complex problems and improve efficiency in various sectors, such as healthcare, transportation, and environmental conservation. By harnessing the power of AI, we can address pressing global challenges, improve the quality of life, and make better use of limited resources.
  3. AI’s potential to enhance human capabilities and create new opportunities: AI can augment human capabilities, enabling us to make better decisions, work more efficiently, and explore new frontiers. Furthermore, AI can create new opportunities for employment and education by generating demand for skilled workers in AI-related fields and by revolutionizing the way we learn through personalized educational experiences.

Now, I will refute the main arguments presented by the proposition:

  • AI’s potential impact on employment and income inequality: While it is true that AI may displace some jobs, it can also create new job opportunities in emerging industries. By investing in education and retraining programs, we can ensure that workers are equipped with the skills needed to adapt to a changing job market, mitigating the potential negative impacts of AI on employment.
  • Ethical concerns and bias in AI decision-making: We must acknowledge the ethical concerns surrounding AI and work proactively to address them. By implementing transparent and accountable AI systems, and by actively addressing biases in the data used to train AI, we can mitigate these risks and ensure that AI is used responsibly.
  • The potential misuse of AI for harmful purposes: The potential misuse of any technology is a valid concern. However, rather than stifling AI development, we should focus on creating robust regulatory frameworks and international cooperation to prevent the malicious use of AI, while still harnessing its benefits for society.

In conclusion, as the leader of Debate Team B, I firmly believe that the widespread development and implementation of artificial intelligence offer more benefits than risks to society. By addressing the challenges posed by AI and working together to ensure responsible development and use, we can unlock its full potential for the betterment of humankind. Thank you.

Sous-chef – AI has a more prominent role in the generation of the text content, but still under close human guidance.

HumanAI Rating System


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

One response to “A prompt for GPT-4 powered debate teams”

  1. Joshua Lenz Avatar
    Joshua Lenz

    I’ve been browsing online greater than 3 hours these days, but I never discovered any fascinating article like yours.
    It’s pretty price enough for me. In my opinion, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content material as you probably did, the internet shall be a lot more helpful than ever before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *